Nathalie | 24.08.2006, 19:11:50 |
---|
Playing bug with the big pieces was fun, but still I say premoving there really is unfair... |
nabla | 24.08.2006, 20:43:07 |
---|
Hehe it can certainly be played without premove, but with 10 minutes instead of 5 !
Talking about time, in your game against schorle, how long did that discussion last, about whether the king and queen should be swapped back ? (the subsequent abort request was finally rejected) |
nabla | 24.08.2006, 20:45:49 |
---|
FantasticCat played a very strange move when I was his partner, I had already mated and he had only four seconds to gain in an overwhelming position : he tried Qd1-d8 mate although there were two other pieces on the d-file !
It must be said that the limit of the giant boards are not very clear, and that he of course intended to play Q@d8 mate. His opponent Tjeulesbetes unpleasantly noticed that c7-c8Q instead was mate it two. |
nabla | 24.08.2006, 20:46:58 |
---|
Oops, I should have made clearer that the previous anecdote happened in a giant board game. |
nabla | 24.08.2006, 20:53:02 |
---|
Some unefficient clock setting happened in a game where I partnered pagloppaglop against fermy and Frédéric Gouy. Both setters (I think it was fermy and pagloppaglop, it could have been me too, tell me if I am wrong :-) ) were equally clumsy as well as in a hurry to start the game, so that game number one was started before clock number two had been set. Then clock number one had to be reset, but in the meantime clock number two had been started. Then clock number two... well, you see what I mean. This must have happened four times before we could finally start the game.
After the opening we had the first sit, and when we checked the clocks... aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh ! One of them had not been started ! |
tjeulesbetes | 25.08.2006, 00:53:11 |
---|
there were a number of local players passing by in the park who, when asked why they didn't join the tournament on saturday, had excuses like "I wasn't informed", or "I didn't know", which shows some level of dishnonesty given all the advertisement work done by nabla, but the most interesting reply came from a guy, when told by nabla "but the dates and infos are written everywhere", who said "yes, it's true, but I didn't realize" !
|
nabla | 25.08.2006, 20:30:26 |
---|
Me and Wayra have a very vague remembrance about a mate by illegal double check, which happened because the mated player hold his move without pressing the clock, and then wrongly took back his move by adding an opponent's piece on the board. Wayra thinks that Tjeulesbetes was the mating player. Does anyone have a better memory than us ? |
|